raw 264 7 (ATCC)
Structured Review

Raw 264 7, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 25428 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/raw 264 7/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 25428 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer"
Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer
Journal: Bioactive Materials
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012
Figure Legend Snippet: PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Incubation, Concentration Assay, In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: TRANS modulates macrophage polarization and promotes antigen present ation. (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization of myeloid cells in the TME following PBS or TRANS treatment. (B) UMAP clusters of myeloid cells. (C) Cell-type-specific marker genes expression of different clusters. (D) Proportion distribution of myeloid cell clusters. (E) KEGG enrichment in M1 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (F) GSEA of NOD-like receptor and JAK-STAT signaling pathways in M1. (G) KEGG enrichment in M2 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (H) Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis and antigen processing/presentation in M2. (I) Scheme of M0 macrophages treated with different TCM. (J) M1 and M2 polarization from M0 macrophages under various treatments; n = 3. (K) STAT1 expression in Raw 264.7 cells. (L) Scheme of M2 macrophages treated with different TCM. (M) Repolarization of M2 macrophages under different treatments; n = 3. (N) H-2K b /SIINFEKL + macrophages in vitro ; n = 3. (O and P) Relative expression of antitumor genes (O) and inflammatory genes (P) in macrophages under different treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (Q) CD69 expression on T cells after co-incubating TCM-treated macrophages and anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated splenic T cells; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance of multiple-group comparisons was calculated using One-way ANOVA. Significance of two-group comparison was calculated using Student's t -test.
Techniques Used: Marker, Expressing, Protein-Protein interactions, In Vitro, Comparison





